Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Kuhlman Electric Corp.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2009No. 2006-SC-000140-DG, 2006-SC-000144-DGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Special Justice ROGER CRITTENDEN.

This is a consolidated appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeals in an attorney/malpractice action and an insurance company/bad faith action arising out of a workers compensation case. Both the successful litigant at the trial and appellate level, the Landrum & Shouse law firm, and the unsuccessful litigant, Kuhlman Electric Corporation, petitioned this Court for discretionary review. The Appellee insurance company, Amerisure (f/k/a Michigan Mutual), did not seek discretionary review.

The trial court in these actions determined that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marrs v. KellyKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Cave Hill CemeteryKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Chappell v. Kentucky Bar Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Chappell v. Kuhlman Electric Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API