Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Cave Hill Cemetery

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2011No. 2010-SC-000223-WCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found in this medical reopening that correspondence between the claimant’s attorney and an insurance adjuster showed the existence of a settlement between the parties. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversed and directed the ALJ to enter an order finding that no settlement was reached and denying the claimant’s motion to enforce the agreement. The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board.

Appealing, the claimant asserts that the ALJ’s decision was correct and should be reinstated. He argues that the parties’ correspondence constitutes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coalfield Telephone Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Newberg v. WeaverKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Chappell v. Kuhlman Electric Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cengage Learning, Inc. v. Reeneace ClemonsKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cengage Learning, Inc. v. Reeneace ClemonsKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cross Maintenance, LLC v. Mark R. RiddleKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Cross Maintenance, LLC v. Mark R. RiddleKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Larry Kidd v. Crossrock Drilling. LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API