Legal Opinion
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 27, 2016No. Case No. 1:10 MD 2196PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*989MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT MOTIONS
JACK ZOUHARY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Introduction
The Class of Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (“IPPs”) moves for final approval of nine class action settlement agreements listed in the following table. Further, Class Counsel for the IPPs moves for an award of attorney fees, reimbursement of expenses, and incentive awards for representative plaintiffs (Doc. 1908).
*990[[Image here]]
Procedural Background
Plaintiffs in this multidistrict antitrust litigation asserted claims that numerous dominant firms in the flexible polyurethane foam market…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Anderson v. Travelex Insurance Services Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
- Blasi v. United Debt Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Blasi v. United Debt Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Catherine Duffy, et al. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.