People v. DePaul
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.*
Convicted of one count of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) by
guilty plea, defendant Victor L. DePaul was granted probation for a period of two years. More than two years later probation was revoked and defendant was sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment. At issue is the meaning of a statutory provision that revocation, “summary or otherwise, shall serve to toll the running of the probationary period.” (Pen. Code, § 1203.2, subd. (a).)
Probation was granted to defendant on December 28, 1978. On August 14, 1980, the court summarily revoked probation but it was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re MehdizadehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. TapiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. TranthamAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.