Legal Opinion

People v. DePaul

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1982No. Crim. 12826PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.*

Convicted of one count of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) by

guilty plea, defendant Victor L. DePaul was granted probation for a period of two years. More than two years later probation was revoked and defendant was sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment. At issue is the meaning of a statutory provision that revocation, “summary or otherwise, shall serve to toll the running of the probationary period.” (Pen. Code, § 1203.2, subd. (a).)

Probation was granted to defendant on December 28, 1978. On August 14, 1980, the court summarily revoked probation but it was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In Re MehdizadehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. TapiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. TranthamAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API