Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Carples
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 25, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’Brien, S.
Questions of construction have been raised concerning testator’s will and particularly as to paragraphs eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth. These paragraphs read as follows:
“ Eighth. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, whether real, personal or mixed, and wheresoever situated, I give, devise and bequeath to my executors and trustees hereinafter named, in trust, nevertheless, for the uses and purposes following:
“ To enter into and upon and take possession of the same; to hold, invest, reinvest and keep invested the same; to collect the rents, interest, income,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schettler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Bryant v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Cruger v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- Wright v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Girard Trust Co. v. SchmitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- In re the Estate of ForteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of AndrusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of RanneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Jenkins v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1989