In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Haight
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Benjamin Haight, a legatee under the last will and testament of Augustus Holly Haight, deceased, from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Orange, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 23d day of January, 1899, denying his motion to amend a decree of said Surrogate’s Court, entered in said court •on the 10th day of November, 1880, and to require Edward Haight, as trustee, etc., of Augustus Holly Haight, deceased, to pay . over to him all the income…
Read the full summary
Appeal by Benjamin Haight, a legatee under the last will and testament of Augustus Holly Haight, deceased, from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Orange, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 23d day of January, 1899, denying his motion to amend a decree of said Surrogate’s Court, entered in said court •on the 10th day of November, 1880, and to require Edward Haight, as trustee, etc., of Augustus Holly Haight, deceased, to pay . over to him all the income of the residuary estate held in trust for said Ben jamin Haight, and also from a decree bearing date the 26th day of…
1Opinion of the Court
Hirschberg, J.:
Augustus Holly Haight died on the ,10th day of April, 1879, leaving a will and codicil which were admitted to probate in Orange county on the eighth day of May following. He named Louis. Haight, Edward Haight and James G. Roe executors and trustees, and letters testamentary were duly issued to them. They there-' after tiled an account in the Surrogate’s Court, and a decree was rendered on such accounting on the 10th day of November, 1880. Louis Haight died in 1894 and James G. Roe in 1896, and Edward Haight has since acted as sole trustee. He has presented an intermediate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Annual Accounts of HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Spencer v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Conrad v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hancox v. . MeekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Born v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In re the Estate of WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- In Re the Will of LibermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Graves v. First National Bank in Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the Estate of ForteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.