Legal Opinion

Annis v. Pfeiffer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 39,184PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.

The action is upon the promissory note for $2,000 to plaintiff, executed by Louisa Pfeiffer and “Mabel F. Hardie, Guardian of Louise P. Manning. ’ ’ Plaintiff had summary judgment against Mrs. Pfeiffer. The action at present is for personal judgment against Mabel P. Hardie, individually. On trial before the court without a jury defendant Hardie had judgment. Plaintiff appeals.

Mrs. Pfeiffer and Louise P. Manning, a minor, were tenants in common of land. On a judgment against Mrs. Pfeiffer levy was made on the premises. She and Mabel Hardie approached plaintiff for a loan of $2,000 to discharge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. FeatherstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Schloss & Kahn v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Bank of Spruce Pine v. VanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Lexington State Bank v. Rose City Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Elgin v. AchilliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Fla. Medical Ass'n v. Dept. of Prof. RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Johnson v. GraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. City National Bank of Detroit v. Westland Towers Apts.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. In Re Dunneback's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API