Legal Opinion

Bank of Spruce Pine v. Vance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 12, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNon, J.

It does not appear from tbe pleadings in tbis action that T. B. Vance was indebted to tbe plaintiff, at bis death, or that bis estate received any consideration for tbe note sued on by tbe plaintiff. It is alleged in the answer that the defendants, S. C. Yance and Ira Yance, as administrators of the estate of T. B. Yance, endorsed the note solely for the accommodation of the makers. It is clear, therefore, that the plaintiff is not entitled to judgment on the pleadings for the amount of the note against the defendants as administrators of T. B. Yance, deceased. Banking Co. v. Morehead, 122 N.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morehead Banking Co. v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Morehead Banking Co. v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. First National Bank of Elgin v. AchilliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Hansen v. LindellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Annis v. PfeifferMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Johnson v. GraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API