Legal Opinion

Raquedan v. Centerplate of Del. Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 3, 2019No. Case No. 17-CV-03828-LHKPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Monique Raquedan and Ronald Martinez ("Plaintiffs") bring this putative class action suit against Defendant Centerplate of Delaware, Inc. ("Defendant") for alleged wage and hour violations. A proposed intervenor, Renee Marquez, filed a motion to intervene, but then withdrew the motion only days before the April 4, 2019 hearing date. Marquez represents that her counsel and Plaintiffs' counsel "agreed to work together in this action and seek to add Marquez as a Plaintiff," and that Marquez's counsel "subsequently withdrew his motion to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Margie Bedolla v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Ronald Fleshman, Jr. v. Volkswagen, AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. HP Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  2. Hilsley v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Perkins v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API