Legal Opinion
Hilsley v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 29, 2020No. 3:17-cv-02335Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRYSTAL HILSLEY, and WILLIAM Case No.: 17cv2335-GPC(MDD) RILEY, on behalf of themselves and all 12 others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING PROPOSED 13 INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO Plaintiff, INTERVENE 14 v. 15 [Dkt. No. 233.] OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES, INC.; 16 ARNOLD WORLDWIDE LLC; and DOES defendants 1 through 5, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is Proposed Intervenors Michael Froio and Mikhail Surman’s 20 motion to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) and 24(b)(1)(B). 21…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Donnelly v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Margie Bedolla v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.