Legal Opinion
Forsyth v. HP Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 21, 2020No. 5:16-cv-04775Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DONNA J. FORSYTH, et al., 8 Case No. 5:16-cv-04775-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER DENYING DANIEL Vv. COCHRAN’S MOTION TO 10 INTERVENE AS A PLAINTIFF HP INC., et al., 1] Re: Dkt. No. 384 Defendants. 13 On August 18, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a putative class action alleging that Defendants 14 || violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), California Fair Employment and © 3 15 || Housing Act (“FEHA”), and other California laws. Complaint § 4, Dkt. 1. Daniel Cochran Q 16 || (“Cochran”) seeks to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Donnelly v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- City of Emeryville v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States of America v. J.B. Stringfellow, Jr., Concerned Neighbors in Action and Penny Newman, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.