Legal Opinion

People v. Muis

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1980No. Crim. 34953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, Acting P. J.

A jury found defendant guilty of trespass (§ 602.5, Pen. Code) a misdemeanor, a lesser but necessarily included offense in burglary (§ 459, Pen. Code) charged in count I, and not guilty of grand theft (count II). He appeals from the judgment (order granting probation).

Appellant concedes that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence but contends that a violation of section 602.5, Penal Code is not a lesser necessarily included offense in a violation of section 459, and the trial court erred in instructing the jury to that effect (CALJIC No. 17.10. ) He…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. WetmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. CannadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LohbauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. State v. RossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API