Legal Opinion

Livonia, City of v. Aquatic Renovation Systems, Inc. d/b/a Renosys Corporation

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 24, 2022No. 2:20-cv-10737Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CITY OF LIVONIA, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-10737 v. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH AQUATIC RENOVATION SYSTEMS, INC., D/B/A RENOSYS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY’S CONCURRENCE AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY (Dkt. 45), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT AQUATIC RENOVATION SYSTEM’S REPLY (Dkt. 46), AND (3) DENYING DEFENDANT AQUATIC RENOVATION…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API