Legal Opinion
In re N. S. Dalsimer & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 22, 1932No. 52212PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
At a meeting of creditors on November 27, 1931, Sydney Haberman was elected trustee by a majority in number and amount of the creditors participating. A large proportion, apparently substantially all, of the votes for him were east under powers of attorney held by himself. Seasonable objection was taken to the referee permitting these to be counted. .This was put on several grounds. Only one of them will be discussed.
No stenographic minutes of the meeting were certified by the referee. In his opinion, however, he says:
“Objection is further made to the election of Sydney…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- May v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In re LewensohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- In re RekersdresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
- Graham-Brown Shoe Co. v. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Deena Woolen Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1953
- In Re Mayflower Hat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In Re Flexible Conveyor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
- Rinderknecht v. Toledo Association of Credit MenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1936
- In Re Construction Supply CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.