Legal Opinion

Rinderknecht v. Toledo Association of Credit Men

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 13, 1936No. 1222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILLITS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs constitute a committee from the Toledo Bar Association, by the latter empowered to bring this action. The parties are properly aligned in the title save for personnel changes which have occurred since the action was begun in November, 1931. The case has lain in our records, with casual interlocutory interruptions of its repose, pending the determination of analogous cases in the state courts.

The defendant, the Toledo Association of Credit Men, which (including its active personnel) will be hereinafter referred to as the association, is a voluntary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Mayflower Hat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. In Re ScottDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1931
  3. In re N. S. Dalsimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conway-Bogue Realty Investment Co. v. Denver Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. In Re Flexible Conveyor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
  3. United States v. BiganDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API