Legal Opinion
Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. Hendrickson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 27, 1923No. 13518PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
This case was tried by the court below without a jury, and the court’s findings of fact are as follows:
“1st. That the land covered by the oil and gas lease in controversy is the allotment of the defendant Thomas Hendrick-son, who is a duly enrolled Creek Indian citizen .of 1-16 blood.
“2nd. That on the 20th day of March, 1916, James Hendrickson, as the guardian of said Thomas Hendrickson, then a minor, made, executed and delivered to the General Investment Company an oil and gas mining lease, in due form, for a period of five years from that date, on said -land; that thereafter, to wit, on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hobbs v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Carlile v. National Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Saylor v. CrookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Stevens v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Carlisle v. National Oil & Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Nelson v. HamraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Popp v. MungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.