Legal Opinion
Carlisle v. National Oil & Dev. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 22, 1924No. 14402PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCo Git Ran, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiffs in error, against the defendants in .error, for the purpose of canceling an oil and gas lease covering the lands of Levi Carlisle. The lease was executed by Thomas L. 'Carlisle, as guardian of Levi Carlisle, to the National Oil & Development Company, on February 23, 1917. Judgment was gendered against the plaintiffs on the pleadings, and from this judgment an -appeal was take^i to this court. The opinion by this court is found in the case of Carlisle v. National Oil & Development Company, 83 Okla. 217, 201 Pac. 377. It was there decided that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carlile v. National Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Hunter Realty Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Powers v. RudeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Capps v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Scott v. Signal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Kincaid v. Black Angus Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Campbell v. McGrathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Standard Savings Loan Association v. ActonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Demayo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.