Levystein v. Whitman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lowndes, Heard before the Hon. IÍURIOSCO AuSTILL, The facts are contained in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKELL, C. J.—
The bill is filed to foreclose a mortgage, and the single point of controversy is whether the mortgage debt had been paid prior to the commencement of suit. The mortgagor was at the time of the several payments, owing the appellants a debt by account unsecured, and one of the payments was derived as is claimed, from a sale of cotton' covered by the mortgage, while the other was derived from a sale of cotton, the mortgage did not embrace. The whole controversy is dependent on the evidence,, rather than on any question of law. The rules of law governing the application of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bobe's Heirs v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- McDonnell v. Branch Bank at MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Webster & Wilson v. SingleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Evans v. LamarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
3Cited by14 opinions
- Halle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Manchuria S. S. Co. v. Harry G. G. Donald & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Witherington & Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Askew Bros. v. Steiner & LobmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Taylor & Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.