Legal Opinion

Max Edlin v. Firemen's Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 21, 1955No. 11248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

Seven defendant fire insurance companies resisted plaintiff’s claim, under seven policies, for loss by fire, occurring November 28,1952, to his Peoria, Illinois store’s contents and merchandise. No claim was made for damage to plaintiff’s building. For their principal defense, and reason for denying all liability to plaintiff, these insurers contended he willfully and maliciously set fire to his property and was precluded from recovery since his sworn proofs of loss, delivered to defendants January 16, 1953, recited that the cause of fire was unknown to plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Village of Lombard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People Ex Rel. Fisher v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Milhim v. Hawkeye Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmid v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1957
  2. Max Edlin v. Firemen's Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  3. Skinner v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API