Legal Opinion

Village of Lombard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1950No. 31288PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn

A suit at law was filed by the village of Lombard, a municipal corporation, in the circuit court of Du Page County to recover a penalty of $200 per day from the Illinois Bell Telephone Company, a corporation, because of its failure or refusal to file a quarterly statement of its gross receipts, as required by ordinance 506 of said village. The defendant, hereafter referred to as the telephone company, appeared and made a motion to dismiss on several grounds, claiming the ordinance was illegal, null and void. The circuit court sustained the motion and ordered the complaint dismissed. The court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Porter v. Rockford, Rock Island & St. Louis RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Thorpe v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Diginet, Incorporated v. Western Union Ats, Incorporated, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant v. City of Chicago, Third-Party-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Arlington Heights National Bank v. Arlington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gannon v. C., M., ST. P. & P. RY. CO.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API