Legal Opinion

Bieber v. Lambert

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1907No. Sac. No. 1486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in a contest concerning the rights of the respective parties to buy school lands from the state, instituted under the provisions of sections 3414 and 3415 of the Political Code.

Ada Lambert made application to purchase the lands, obtained a certificate therefor and transferred the same to the Central Trust Company before the action, in pursuance of the surveyor-general’s order of reference, was begun. The Trust Company claims only as her successor in interest. She was duly served with summons in the action, but failed ta appear and her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garfield v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gilson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Prentice v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McFaul v. PfankuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hinckley v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moran v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Craycroft v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Risdon v. SteynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Dean v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API