Risdon v. Steyner
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County, and from an order denying a new trial. Chas. M. Head, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On March 29, 1906, the surveyor general of California, as such and as ex officio register of the state land office, made an order referring to the superior court of Shasta county the question which had arisen in his office as to which of the persons, the plaintiff, Buth C. Eisdon, or the defendant, George W. Steyner, was entitled to purchase of the state of California the southeast quarter of section seven, the northeast quarter of section eighteen, and the north half of section seventeen, township 34 north, range 2 east, M. D. M. The said Euth C. Eisdon, on March 24, 1906, had filed with the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bieber v. LambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Curran v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Batt v. StedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Dean v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908