Legal Opinion
State v. Greenman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 2013No. A12-1605PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
The State of Minnesota challenges dismissal of third-degree driving-while-impaired (DWI) charges against respondent Mark Alan Greenman, contending that the district court erred in concluding that a “Segway” electric personal assistive mobility device (Segway) is not included in the definition of “motor vehicle” in the DWI statute. See Minn.Stat. § 169A.03, subd. 15. Because we conclude that Greenman’s operation of a Segway did not make him a driver of a motor vehicle under MinmStat. § 169A.20, subd. 1, we affirm.
FACTS
According to the complaint, just after five p.m. on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Baughman v. Walt Disney World CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mark Greenman v. Officer Jeremiah JessenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Gene KremminCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021