Legal Opinion

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7044, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,043, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9738 Ernest Maldonado v. Department of Agriculture United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1998No. 96-70657Published

1Opinion of the Court

154 F.3d 1086

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7044, 96 Daily Journal

D.A.R. 10,043,

98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9738

Ernest MALDONADO, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; United States of America, Respondents.

No. 96-70657.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 2, 1997.

Decided Sept. 9, 1998.

Joseph Choate, Jr., Choate & Choate, Los Angeles, California, for petitioner.

Libbi J. Finelsen, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Department of Agriculture. D.C. No. PACA RC 94-1042.

Before:…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Lilly Minotto v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Peggy A. Hart v. Department of Agriculture and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Jean-Pierre Bell v. Department of Agriculture United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Maldonado v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API