Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1998No. 96-70657PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Ernest Maldonado worked for decades in a Los Angeles produce company where he rose from a job loading and unloading trucks to the position of head of the vegetable department. In 1990, new owners purchased the company, looted it, and made Maldonado titular president during the company’s collapse. Maldonado here seeks review of the Department of Agriculture’s administrative order finding that he was “responsibly connected” to the company under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”), which prohibits him from working in the produce industry for a period of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Lilly Minotto v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Peggy A. Hart v. Department of Agriculture and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Jean-Pierre Bell v. Department of Agriculture United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perfectly Fresh Farms, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7044, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,043, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9738 Ernest Maldonado v. Department of Agriculture United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API