Legal Opinion

Tuckerman v. Moynihan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 1933PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

At its annual town meeting in March, 1932, the town of Hamilton passed three votes: (1) “That the Surveyor of Highways be hereby instructed that all work *564on highways, including Snow Removal, where trucks are required, be let to the lowest bidder after sealed proposals have been received in response to suitable advertising in the Salem Evening News, work under this motion to start not later than April 1, 1932, and further, that said contract be approved by the Board of Selectmen; that the bidders on work on highways, including Snow Removal be limited to the Town of Hamilton”; (2) “That the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Brewster v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Hawks v. Inhabitants of CharlemontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. D. N. Kelley & Son, Inc. v. Selectmen of FairhavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Continental Construction Co. v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Sunderland v. Building Inspector of North AndoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API