Pacemaker Plastics Co., Inc. v. AFM Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
With this opinion and related order, the Court rules on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the shareholder derivative and breach of contract claims asserted against them by Plaintiffs Pacemaker Plastics Co. Inc., Thermal Foams, Inc., and Therma Foam, Inc. 1 [Docs. 7 and 13]. Because Plaintiffs do not fairly and adequately represent similarly-situated shareholders, the Court dismisses the Plaintiffs’ derivative claim. And finding Plaintiffs lack standing to sue for breach of contract, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs’ contract claims.
I
This dispute arises from an abandoned…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Samantha Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville and Bush-Quayle '92 Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LeVanger v. HIGHLAND ESTATES PROPERTIES OWNERS ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- LeVanger v. HIGHLAND ESTATES PROPERTIES OWNERS ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003