Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Randall

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1980No. 4587PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

While under the age of 18, David, with another, burglarized plaintiff’s home and took “jewelry and coins of a fair value of $2,000.00”. The property stolen was never recovered. Plaintiff obtained judgment against defendants, who are the parents of David, for the value of the property stolen by David. The parents appeal, asserting they were not liable under the applicable statute. We agree.

Section 32-l-46(A), N.M.S.A.1978 states:

A. Any person may recover damages not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) in a civil action in a court or tribunal of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. In Re Appeal No. 769, Term 1974Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Ross Ex Rel. Ross v. SouterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alber Ex Rel. Alber v. NolleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Arnold v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API