Legal Opinion

Eckdahl v. Hurwitz

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1940No. 2153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Chief Justice.

This cause is here through the direct appeal method of procedure to review a judgment of the district court of Albany County denying an application made therein by the plaintiffs, Charles Eckdahl and O. C. Dinelly, for an injunction to issue against the defendant, Al Hurwitz. Both a temporary restraining order and a permanent injunction were sought. The decision of the district court aforesaid was adverse to the plaintiffs on both applications. The basis upon which plaintiffs predicated their right to relief was that the defendant by his acts injured plaintiffs, destroyed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People ex rel. L'Abbe v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. United-Detroit Theaters Corp. v. Colonial Theatrical Enterprise, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. McPheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State Ex Rel. La Prade v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Civic Ass'n of Wyoming v. Railway Motor Fuels, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  2. SCH. DIST. NO. 351 ONEIDA CTY v. Oneida Ed. Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Kirk v. GailWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  4. SCH. DIST. NO. 351 ONEIDA CTY v. Oneida Ed. Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Insurance DepartmentWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API