Legal Opinion

United-Detroit Theaters Corp. v. Colonial Theatrical Enterprise, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1937No. Docket No. 163, Calendar No. 39,513PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The facts in this cause are not in dispute. The plaintiff’s State theater is located on Woodward avenue between Elizabeth and Columbia streets. The defendants ’ Colonial theater is located on Woodward avenue near Sibley street. The Majestic theater is located on Woodward avenue near Willis avenue. In February, 1937, plaintiff filed a bill of complaint in the circuit court of Wayne county to enjoin the defendant companies from conduct-' ing in their theaters what is known as a “screeno” game. The “screeno” cards are given to patrons of the theater with each admission ticket sold. The cards are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Society Theatre v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sproat-Temple Theatre Corp. v. ColoniaL Theatrical Enterprise, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. Attorney General v. Powerpick Player's Club of Michigan, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Little River Theatre Corp. v. State Ex Rel. HodgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API