Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Faulknier

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1926No. Appeals 67, 68, 69, and 70PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

There axe four appeals from four sentences all concurrent. There were two transactions and two cases arose out of each and counsel have designated them as the Lofstead and the Eppolito cases respectively.

In the Lofstead cases, one indictment charged Faulknier, the defendant, with extortion, the other indictment charged him and Bowman with conspiracy to extort. The two charges, as stated, arose out of the same occurrence and they were tried together. The first objection we are to meet is that the appellant was wronged in being compelled to go to trial jointly with his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. SandersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Casper v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Commonwealth v. DanaleczkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. Sonis SonisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. AnticoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth of Penna. v. BeattieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API