Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Danaleczk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1925No. Appeals, 58PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión by

Porter, J.,

■These defendants were all charged, in a single information, with having committed the crime of felonious rape upon Agnes Wasko and with having committed a like offense upon Nellie Madera and were, after a hearing, held to answer the charge. Two indictments, based on the same information, were found by the grand jury, in one of which all the defendants were charged, in proper form, with the rape of Agnes Wasko; and the other indictment charged a like offense to have been committed upon Nellie Madera. The indictments were tried together and the trial resulted in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValottaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Batdorff v. Farmers' National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TraceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. MulroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth of Penna. v. BeattieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Commonwealth v. CauffielSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Commonwealth v. McCordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API