Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Norris

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1925No. Appeal 3PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Appellant was indicted and coñvi’eted in the court below of the offense of extortion. He complains upon this appeal that the conviction cannot stand because: 1. The indictment should have been quashed; 2. the evidence is insufficient to sustain-the conviction; 3. there were errors committed in excluding certain evidence.

1. The first count in the indictment, which was the only count on which appellant was convicted, charged that he “being then and there an officer of this Commonwealth, to wit, Chief of Police of the Borough of Emporium in said County, did extort money…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SaulsburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Commonwealth v. Keenan & ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  3. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HackneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. FaulknierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Commonwealth v. FrancisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. RuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API