Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tallapoosa County v. Butler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1933No. 3 Div. 55PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The motion of the state of Alabama to dismiss the “application for the writ of mandamus'’ was challenged by demurrer, which, on due consideration, was overruled, the motion of the state granted, and the application for writ of mandamus dismissed. From the action of the trial court in sustaining the state’s motion, this appeal was taken. °

The decisions in State ex rel. Chilton County v. Butler, State Tax Com’r, 225 Ala. 191, 142 So. 531, and State ex rel. Foshee v. Butler, State Tax Com’r, 225 Ala. 194, 142 So. 533, touch some phases of this case. In the Foshee Case, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chilton County v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Foshee v. State Ex Rel. MesserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. State v. Doster-Northington Drug Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. King v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Bibb v. GastonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Ex parte DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. State v. A.R.C.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Gay v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Schillaci v. Gentry (Ex parte Gentry)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API