Foshee v. State Ex Rel. Messer
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
As a general rule, a writ of mandamus will not issue to review an exercise of judicial or quasi judicial discretion, and this rule applies to the approval of official bond. Payne v. Spragins, 207 Ala. 264, 92 South. 466; Mobile Co. v. Cleveland, 76 Ala. 321; Ex parte Harris, 52 Ala. 87, 23 Am. Rep. 559.
This rule, however, has an exception in this jurisdiction, for in some cases the writ of mandamus has been employed to correct errors of inferior tribunals, and to prevent a failure of justice where there is a clear right and there is an absence of any other adequate remedy, and it has also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Wilson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Ex parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Longshore v. State ex rel. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Karagan v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Sparks v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Evans v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Baker v. Denniston-Boykin Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Arnold v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.