Legal Opinion

North Pacific Erectors, Inc. v. State, Department of Administration

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2013No. 6818 S-14606PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises from a contract dispute between North Pacific Erectors, Inc. and the Alaska Department of Administration. North Pacific and the Department contracted for a renovation and asbestos removal project in the Juneau State Office Building. After work began, North Pacific requested additional payment for the asbestos removal, claiming there was a differing site condition that made the project more labor-intensive than it had expected. The Department denied the differing site condition claim, and North Pacific filed an administrative appeal.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Adams v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. Lathan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morris O. Johnson, Jr., And/Or Morris O. Johnson, Jr., dba Johnson Construction Company v. Albin Carlson & Co., Contractors, and Patrick Albin Carlson Joint Venture, LLC, Albin Carlson & Co., Contractors and Patrick Albin Carlson Joint Venture, LLC v. Morris O. Johnson, Jr., And/Or Morris O. Johnson, Jr., DBA Johnson Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Xin Wang v. Injective Labs Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API