North Pacific Erectors, Inc. v. State, Department of Administration
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal arises from a contract dispute between North Pacific Erectors, Inc. and the Alaska Department of Administration. North Pacific and the Department contracted for a renovation and asbestos removal project in the Juneau State Office Building. After work began, North Pacific requested additional payment for the asbestos removal, claiming there was a differing site condition that made the project more labor-intensive than it had expected. The Department denied the differing site condition claim, and North Pacific filed an administrative appeal.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Adams v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Lathan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morris O. Johnson, Jr., And/Or Morris O. Johnson, Jr., dba Johnson Construction Company v. Albin Carlson & Co., Contractors, and Patrick Albin Carlson Joint Venture, LLC, Albin Carlson & Co., Contractors and Patrick Albin Carlson Joint Venture, LLC v. Morris O. Johnson, Jr., And/Or Morris O. Johnson, Jr., DBA Johnson Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
- Xin Wang v. Injective Labs Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025