Legal Opinion

Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 5, 1932No. 104PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Petitioner, in 1912, acquired West Virginia coal lands in fee and, by assignment from the prior owners, certain leases or contracts entered into by them with various coal operators, by which the latter acquired the right to enter upon and use the lands for the production of coal and coke for a specified period, in consideration of stipulated royalties for the coal and coke produced, including minimum royalty' payments in each year. In determining petitioner’s income and profits taxes for the years 1920 to 1926, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue treated the royalty payments, after deducting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Burnet v. Thompson Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API