Legal Opinion

King v. Bradley

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 9, 1993No. 92 C 1564PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LINDBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Mollie King, Bobby Dunbar, Sharon Murphy, and their children, are clients of Illinois’ Title IV-D child support enforcement program. They are seeking to bring a class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to enjoin defendants, Philip Bradley, Director of Illinois Department of Public Aid (“IDPA”), and Isabel Blanco, Acting Administrator of the IDPA’s Division of Child Support Enforcement (“DCSE”), to comply with the statutory requirements of the Child Support Enforcement Act (“Title IV-D”), 42 U.S.C. § 651, et seq., and with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Albiston v. Maine Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. In Re Marriage of LappeIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Freestone v. CowanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Davis v. McClaranTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Methodist Hospital v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API