Legal Opinion

Levy v. Senate of Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 2013PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

In this appeal, we consider the interaction of the attorney-client privilege and the Right-to-Know Law, Act of February 14, 2008, P.L. 6, 65 P.S. §§ 67.101-67.3104 (“RTKL”), in a case involving a journalist’s request for documents relating to the legal representation of Senate Democratic Caucus employees. After review, we reaffirm the general rule that client identities are not protected by the attorney-client privilege but adopt specified exceptions to this general rule. Similarly, we affirm the Commonwealth Court’s determination that general descriptions of legal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. SWB YANKEES LLC v. WintermantelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of Nathan MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. McGowan v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Pennsylvania State EduCation Ass'n ex rel. Wilson v. Commonwealth, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. PA State Police, Aplt. v. Grove, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API