Legal Opinion

Mumford v. Mechanics Loan & Savings Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1930No. 20261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

A garnishment proceeding is an altogether separate and distinct suit from the original action on which the garnishment is based' (Warlick v. Neal Loan & Banking Co., 120 Ga. 1070, 1071, 48 S. E. 402), and the recovery which may be had on the garnishment bond is such damages as the defendant in garnishment may be entitled to as having been sustained because of the suing out of the garnishment. It is not the policy of the law to give to the defendant a right of action on the bond for any damage which he may have suffered as a result of the previous ordinary suit upon which the garnishment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. United States Conservation Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Warlick v. Neal Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Leathers v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbus Fertilizer Corp. v. International Agricultural Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API