Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. United States Conservation Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
One against whom an attachment is sought, although none of his property has been actually seized by a levy, may sustain serious financial damage as a result of the mere pendency of the initiatory process created by the filing of the affidavit and bond for attachment. It does not follow, however, that for such he can recover upon the statutory bond required of the plaintiff in attachment under the Civil Code (1910), § 5057. The liability upon the bond arises out of a contractual relationship, and is limited by the terms of the contract. The bond permits a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McFarland v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- King v. YarbraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Albright-Pryor Co. v. Pacific Selling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Fourth National Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Frost v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Solomon Refrigeration, Inc. v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Harris v. LipsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Clark Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Boykin v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Dunn & McCarthy Inc. v. PinkstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.