Legal Opinion

Morrow Retail Stores, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided May 4, 1953No. 1813PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRIVER, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover on an insurance policy, issued by the defendant, for merchandise inventory shortage, claimed to have been caused by fraudulent or dishonest acts of plaintiff’s employees. A jury, trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, but the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial. The parties have stipulated that the case may be tried before the court, without a jury, on the transcript of the testimony received and the exhibits admitted in evidence on the former trial.

Plaintiff’s claim is based upon insuring agreement 1 of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Shreveport Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Drumbar v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Grant v. Wark Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Husch Brothers v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Thompson Lumber Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCommerce Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. W. D. Felder & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Hoboken Camera Ctr., Inc. v. HARTFORD ACC. & IND.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Glens Falls Indemnity Company v. National Floor & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Reese Cadillac Corp. v. Glens Falls Insur. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Savannah Wholesale Company v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API