Paulino v. Town of Concord
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff on November 3, 1922, through a defect in a highway. G. L. c. 84, §§ 15-26.
Material evidence is set forth to the effect that the highway was macadamized to the width of eighteen to nineteen and one half feet with a high crown, with a curve to the right as the plaintiff was driving, and higher on the right than on the left. At the right and immediately adjacent to the macadam were tracks for a single trolley car line, between the rails of which the gravel was worn smooth by other travel.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Atlantic Maritime Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Macomber v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Carey v. Inhabitants of HubbardstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Nagle v. DriverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sweetman v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Zwick v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Mathewson v. ColpittsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Scott v. Manager State Airport, Hanscom FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. BreskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.