Legal Opinion
Nagle v. Driver
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 29, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries. At the close of the evidence, the defendant made a motion for a directed verdict in his favor and excepted to its denial. Verdict was returned for the plaintiff. The case comes before us on “report,” wherein the judge states that, “Before recording the verdict I reserved leave with the assent of the jury to enter a verdict for the defendant if, upon the exceptions taken or the questions of law reserved,. . . the Supreme Judicial Court should decide that such verdict should have been ordered. After the verdict, the defendant filed a motion for a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Atlantic Maritime Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Scannell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Sweetman v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Zwick v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.