Edenfield v. C v. Seal Co., Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
The sole assignment of error is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment.
At the outset we have in mind the well-known rule that this court will not overturn the findings of the trial court unless the evidence clearly preponderates against them. (Warren v. Senecal, 71 Mont. 210, 228 Pac. 71.)
The court’s findings to the effect that the corporation was created by Seal, his wife, and his hired man to enable Seal to put his property beyond the reach of his creditors, and that his transfer of his property to the company was without consideration, are fully sustained by the evidence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Raymond v. BlancgrassMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
- Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Wheeler & Motter Merc. Co. v. MoonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Warren v. SenecalMontana Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fousek v. DeforestMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Ferrell v. EllingMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Teisinger v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- First National Bank v. ConnerMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re Harlie L. Teigen Jane Teigen, Debtors, Harlie L. Teigen Jane Teigen Bar 11 Ranch, Ltd. Nathan O. Teigen William Harlie Teigen Matthew Lee Teigen v. Dennis C. Hoeger, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.