Raetzsch v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
Appellant appeals pro se from a jury conviction of burglary of a building. The jury, after finding appellant had been previously convicted of two felonies, enhanced and assessed punishment at twenty-five years confinement in the Texas Depart ment of Corrections. Appellant’s case is before this Court now by reason of a grant of an out-of-time appeal by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In his first point of error, appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Burdine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Sawyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Dedesma v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Monse v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Herring v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.