Legal Opinion
In re Circuit Breaker Litigation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 1, 1997No. CV 88-3012 CBMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS’ ANTITRUST AND INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE COUNTERCLAIMS, AND UL’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATIONS OF SMITH AND WEINSTEIN
CONSUELO BLAND MARSHALL, District Judge.
The matters before the Court, the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, United States *1271District Judge, presiding, are Plaintiffs’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendants’ Antitrust and Intentional Interference for Prospective Economic Advantage Counterclaims, and UL’s Motion to Strike the Declarations of Richard L. Smith and Roy Weinstein.1 Upon…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Sebastian International, Inc. v. RussolilloDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- International Test & Balance, Inc. v. Associated Air & Balance CouncilDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998