Legal Opinion
Matter of Katz's Delicatessen v. O'Connell
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1951PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.
The State Liquor Authority, after notice and hearing, suspended for five days the petitioner’s retail beer license for having suffered and permitted gambling on the licensed premises in violation of subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law which provides: “ 6. No person licensed to sell alcoholic beverages shall suffer or permit any gambling on the licensed premises, or suffer or permit such premises to become disorderly.” (Emphasis supplied.) Concededly, the gambling was not of the variety condemned by the criminal statutes but was a social game of poker played in a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Avon Bar & Grill, Inc. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Leogrande v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Beal Properties, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. Bart's Restaurant Corp.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Norms Realty Corp. v. RodriguezCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- United States v. DicristinaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.