Legal Opinion

Faust v. Heckler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1948No. Appeal, 30PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Horace Stern,

As the court below properly held, plaintiffs are entitled to an accounting by defendant of the profits of the stripping operations conducted on the coal land owned by the parties as tenants in common.

In 1923 there was conveyed to B. F. Heckler and L. L. Faust, trading under the firm name of Heckler & Faust Coal Company, a certain seam of chai underlying a tract of 192 acres of land in Somerset County. The partnership carried on deep mining operations on this land for a period of ten years. In 1933 Heckler entered into an agreement to sell his half interest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coleman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Stimson v. StimsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Tanney v. TanneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Maguire v. Preferred Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. McGowan v. Bailey, Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Abraham v. MihalichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Collins v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Hunt Et Vir. v. MestrezatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Fisher v. Advanta Finance Corp. (In Re Fisher)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API