Legal Opinion
Abraham v. Mihalich
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1984No. 199PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this appeal from a final equity decree refusing to set aside a quitclaim deed, the appellant grantors allege (1) that the deed was not delivered, and (2) that the acknowledgement was invalid because the grantors were unaware that a notary public was present and witnessed the deed’s execution. For reasons hereinafter set forth, we affirm.
Whether there has been a delivery of a deed is a question of fact to be determined from the evidence by the trial court. Mower v. Mower, 367 Pa. 325, 327, 80 A.2d 856, 858 (1951); In re Cray’s Estate, 353 Pa. 25, 27, 44 A.2d 286, 287 (1945);…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City Stores Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pronzato v. GuerrinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Chambley v. RumbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Loutzenhiser v. DoddoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Mower v. MowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Funches v. Household Finance Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Funches)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bell v. Parkway Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Bell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Armstrong v. Nationwide Mortgage Plan/Trust (In Re Armstrong)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Atiyeh v. BearSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Orsa Associates, Inc. v. MBA Financial, Inc. (In Re Orsa Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.